FT-CI

Government Shutdown in the imperialist US

02/10/2013

Government Shutdown in the imperialist US

After the government shutdown, more than 800,000 federal workers are immediately furloughed and over a million more will work without pay. Offices that provide important social services and National Parks and museums will be closed. Depending on its duration, the shutdown could cost billions to the US economy. Goldman Sachs estimates that this shutdown would reduce growth in the fourth quarter of the year by 0.1 per cent at an annualised rate if it lasts only 2 days, and by 0.3 percentage points in case it lasts a week. (The last shutdown in 1995/96 lasted 20 days and represented losses of 1.4 billion dollars to just the federal government)

Pushed by Senator Ted Cruz and the Tea Party agenda, Republicans are carrying out a harsh campaign to defund Obamacare, using the threat of a shutdown as a bargaining chip. Since Republicans have won the Majority in the House of Representatives in 2010, they have used this power to put pressure on the White House and force changes in the implementation of the healthcare law. Although the strategy is not new, this time the measure has reached disproportionate consequences. The reason for this intransigency should be searched at the Republicans infighting. The tough dispute between factions of the Republican Party has given the Tea Party, its ultra-conservative wing, an unusual power over the bargaining on Congress. This faction, which constitutes less than 20% of the House Representative caucus but holds the margin of victory over the Democrats, has deliberately led the negotiation to a stalemate. GOP senators have also been attacked by a campaign funded by the ‘Conservative Senate Fund’, for not being hard enough in the fight against Obamacare. The use of shutdown as a leverage to defund the healthcare overhaul is aggravating the internal crisis in the Republican Party between those who acknowledge the cost of holding such an extreme position and those who believe they are lacking combativeness to attract votes.
The latest plan proposed by the GOP on Sunday before the shutdown included the funding of the government through Dec. 15, and delayed for one year the individual coverage mandate and the insurance exchanges (see below) which were set to launch on Tuesday and eliminated a 2.3 percent tax on medical devices. The Democratic-led senate rejected the bill Monday and sent it back to the House without the ACA postponement and the tax repeal.

The Phantom of Default

The ‘sequester’ is a package of spending cuts designed in 2011, when Obama and senate Democrats were first forced into trading spending reductions for an increase in the debt ceiling. It was the price they paid to avert the Fiscal Cliff. The Budget Control Act demands $1.15 trillion in savings over the next 10 years, beginning March 1st 2013. These cutbacks affect spending on "discretionary" programs and result in: cuts in unemployment insurance, defunding of education, furloughs of federal workers, and the loss of millions of jobs.
The historical debt growth under Obama administration has its origins in the government bail-out to banks and companies to prevent bankruptcies. The Corporate Class, in turn, discharged the crisis on the workers and the state, as it is the case of the Detroit default. On the other hand, a strong determinant of the rise in the federal debt is the increasing expenditures in Defense. In this point, Democrats and Republicans agreed and voted unanimously to ensure the payments for the military forces in case of a shutdown.

The ObamaCare dispute

If any worker in the US was convinced that the Democrats were fighting to give health benefits to the people, the facts show otherwise. The real struggle behind the scenes is between two sides of the same capitalist class. Although the ACA was allegedly enacted to give health care to a large portion of the population, from the beginning it never jeopardized the profits of the health industry. From then on, every modification has made it more moderate and adjusted it to the will of the corporations. (see table)
So on the one side, there´s Big Pharma, the HMOs (health insurance companies), private health providers and other health-related corporations who are eager to take a big bite at the estimated 25 million people thrown into the health insurance market, now that they are compelled to buy insurance by the law’s individual coverage mandate. On the other side, employers outside health industry will face the additional costs of offering health insurance benefits –paying part of the fee- to their employees. However, it’s a fact that the start-up of the ACA provisions could enable the access to Medicaid for many poor people in the country. The Republicans attack on Obamacare is reactionary and overlooks the urgent need of extended health care for the poor. However, Obamacare fails to bring a real solution to needs of the people. Although it would ease access to health care for many people through Medicaid expansion and government subsidies, the law was dictated by the corporations of the health industry and written for their profit. Besides that, there is the question of how to guarantee a decent health care when Medicaid is already in meltdown.

National universal health care

Two-thirds of the population in the U.S. today wants a publicly-run health service. Health care is a human right, and as such, should be guaranteed by the federal and state governments. The only way to achieve complete access to health care is by building a universal public health care system, run by the state, funded by taxes to the major corporations, and administered by a committee of workers and users. Private clinics and drug companies must be expropriated to give health care to the almost 50 million people that today still fail to have access and prevent the 100,000 annual deaths due to lack of health coverage or partial coverage and unaffordable costs. It’s inconceivable that companies continue to profit from people’s illnesses. But Democrats as well as Republicans are up to their ears in ensuring profits to capitalists. We should expect nothing good from the “best Congress money can buy”.

The government shutdown is the result of the culmination of the ongoing dispute between Republicans and Democrats, neither of whom represents the needs of the working class. As usual, Republicans are pushing to reduce government spending, while Democrats profit from their opponents’ fanaticism and fiercely defend the ACA (Affordable Care Act) at the same time that they have endorsed every cut to it since its enactment in 2010. Despite their differences, Democrats and Republicans share a common objective: defending the interests of the capitalist class. The working class must build its own political tool to achieve class independence.

Related articles

No hay comentarios a esta nota

Newspapers

  • EDITORIAL

    PTS (Argentina)

  • Actualidad Nacional

    MTS (México)

  • EDITORIAL

    LTS (Venezuela)

  • DOSSIER : Leur démocratie et la nôtre

    CCR NPA (Francia)

  • ContraCorriente Nro42 Suplemento Especial

    Clase contra Clase (Estado Español)

  • Movimento Operário

    MRT (Brasil)

  • LOR-CI (Bolivia) Bolivia Liga Obrera Revolucionaria - Cuarta Internacional Palabra Obrera Abril-Mayo Año 2014 

Ante la entrega de nuestros sindicatos al gobierno

1° de Mayo

Reagrupar y defender la independencia política de los trabajadores Abril-Mayo de 2014 Por derecha y por izquierda

La proimperialista Ley Minera del MAS en la picota

    LOR-CI (Bolivia)

  • PTR (Chile) chile Partido de Trabajadores Revolucionarios Clase contra Clase 

En las recientes elecciones presidenciales, Bachelet alcanzó el 47% de los votos, y Matthei el 25%: deberán pasar a segunda vuelta. La participación electoral fue de solo el 50%. La votación de Bachelet, representa apenas el 22% del total de votantes. 

¿Pero se podrá avanzar en las reformas (cosméticas) anunciadas en su programa? Y en caso de poder hacerlo, ¿serán tales como se esperan en “la calle”? Editorial El Gobierno, el Parlamento y la calle

    PTR (Chile)

  • RIO (Alemania) RIO (Alemania) Revolutionäre Internationalistische Organisation Klasse gegen Klasse 

Nieder mit der EU des Kapitals!

Die Europäische Union präsentiert sich als Vereinigung Europas. Doch diese imperialistische Allianz hilft dem deutschen Kapital, andere Teile Europas und der Welt zu unterwerfen. MarxistInnen kämpfen für die Vereinigten Sozialistischen Staaten von Europa! 

Widerstand im Spanischen Staat 

Am 15. Mai 2011 begannen Jugendliche im Spanischen Staat, öffentliche Plätze zu besetzen. Drei Jahre später, am 22. März 2014, demonstrierten Hunderttausende in Madrid. Was hat sich in diesen drei Jahren verändert? Editorial Nieder mit der EU des Kapitals!

    RIO (Alemania)

  • Liga de la Revolución Socialista (LRS - Costa Rica) Costa Rica LRS En Clave Revolucionaria Noviembre Año 2013 N° 25 

Los cuatro años de gobierno de Laura Chinchilla han estado marcados por la retórica “nacionalista” en relación a Nicaragua: en la primera parte de su mandato prácticamente todo su “plan de gobierno” se centró en la “defensa” de la llamada Isla Calero, para posteriormente, en la etapa final de su administración, centrar su discurso en la “defensa” del conjunto de la provincia de Guanacaste que reclama el gobierno de Daniel Ortega como propia. Solo los abundantes escándalos de corrupción, relacionados con la Autopista San José-Caldera, los casos de ministros que no pagaban impuestos, así como el robo a mansalva durante los trabajos de construcción de la Trocha Fronteriza 1856 le pusieron límite a la retórica del equipo de gobierno, que claramente apostó a rivalizar con el vecino país del norte para encubrir sus negocios al amparo del Estado. martes, 19 de noviembre de 2013 Chovinismo y militarismo en Costa Rica bajo el paraguas del conflicto fronterizo con Nicaragua

    Liga de la Revolución Socialista (LRS - Costa Rica)

  • Grupo de la FT-CI (Uruguay) Uruguay Grupo de la FT-CI Estrategia Revolucionaria 

El año que termina estuvo signado por la mayor conflictividad laboral en más de 15 años. Si bien finalmente la mayoría de los grupos en la negociación salarial parecen llegar a un acuerdo (aún falta cerrar metalúrgicos y otros menos importantes), los mismos son un buen final para el gobierno, ya que, gracias a sus maniobras (y las de la burocracia sindical) pudieron encausar la discusión dentro de los marcos del tope salarial estipulado por el Poder Ejecutivo, utilizando la movilización controlada en los marcos salariales como factor de presión ante las patronales más duras que pujaban por el “0%” de aumento. Entre la lucha de clases, la represión, y las discusiones de los de arriba Construyamos una alternativa revolucionaria para los trabajadores y la juventud

    Grupo de la FT-CI (Uruguay)