FT-CI

French and British flags in Benghazi

Sarkozy and Cameron reaffirm the imperialist plan for Libya

27/09/2011

Since last week, the picture of French President Nicolas Sarkozy and British Prime Minister David Cameron in Benghazi, next to the leaders of the Libyan National Transitional Council (NTC), has been going around the world. After the September 1 meeting of the "friends of Libya" in Paris, the very imperialist powers that planned and carried out the NATO bombings are now getting ready to decide about the future Libyan regime, that is already going through its first disagreements in trying to form the interim cabinet. After winning support in most countries, another sign of US and European imperialism’s recognition for the NTC has arrived: Libya’s delegation in the UN General Assembly, occupying the seat that dictator Gaddafi was occupying until very recently. Although the NTC had planned to appear in New York with the new government, it was impossible to resolve the crisis that was begun by the appointments. Several discussions have begun: what weight the Islamist organizations will have; what role the former members of the regime have, beginning with the current Prime Minister Mahmoud Jibril (a Gaddafi official from 2007 to 2011) or the interim President Mustafa Abdel Jalil (former Justice Minister). The weight of the different regions of the country is also under discussion. These tensions, together with the resistance of Gaddafi’s troops, as in Sirte (whose real potential has not yet been able to be measured), could be the main obstacles to consolidating the new government.

The presence of Cameron and Sarkozy in the re-named "Tahrir Square" in Benghazi, known as the center of the rebellion against Gaddafi’s government, again shows the willingness of France and Great Britain, as well as other countries, to fight for their share in the new Libyan setting. In a cynical set-up, with the Benghazi square flooded with French and British flags, Cameron declared that it was "great to be in a free Libya," as if Great Britain had not re-established commercial and political relations with the Gaddafi dictatorship years ago. Sarkozy joined in: "You wanted peace, you wanted freedom, you wanted economic progress. France, Great Britain and Europe will be on the side of the Libyan people." Whoever does not suspect some self-interest on the part of these imperialist vultures is naive, at least. In turn, the NTC leaders were grateful for help from the imperialist coalition: "Victory would never have been possible without the allies’ help," declared the Prime Minister designate, Mahmoud Jibril, who thus recognizes the role played by NATO much more clearly than those who, since the alleged help to the Libyan people, have justified the NATO intervention (among whom there are, unfortunately, leftist figures and organizations), that included the bombing of several cities. They were also grateful, in advance, for the commitment to reconstruction (France and Great Britain promised to contribute — in reality, to unfreeze a part of the 14 billion euros in confiscated Libyan funds — to rebuild the country). Also, both France and Great Britain reaffirmed their oil deals and agreed on new percentages for running the enormous Libyan reserves (several media reported that France kept the operation of around 35% of the reserves). With a lower profile, the United States was present in Tripoli through Assistant Secretary of State for Near Eastern Affairs Jeffrey Feltman, who also met with another NTC leader, Mustafa Abdul Jalil.

After the "democratic revolution"

With his visit, Cameron reaffirmed the commitment of the summit of the "friends of Libya," and asserted that NATO’s mission will stay while there are pro-Gaddafi troops who control areas of the country. What is now impossible to maintain is that NATO’s "humanitarian" mission, with US and European bombings and the military leadership of France and Great Britain, will be able to encourage a democratic future for Libya. Those who celebrated the victorious "democratic revolution" or justified and actively backed the NATO intervention and the bombings in favor of the rebels as the only alternative to repression by the Gaddafi dictatorship, are now facing the bitter reality of imperialist interference in the making of the new Libyan regime. As has been asserted at every step, the same imperialist powers that yesterday benefited from making deals with the dictator Gaddafi, are now seeking, after a pretense of humanitarianism, to win prestige among the masses of the Arab world. Again, we are wondering, as we did in other issues of La Verdad Obrera, what further proofs will be needed for organizations like the LIT, Izquierda Socialista, the French NPA, or intellectuals like Gilbert Achcar, to revise their position, that ends up actively backing imperialism’s "democratic" pose.

21-09-2011

Related articles

No hay comentarios a esta nota

Newspapers

  • EDITORIAL

    PTS (Argentina)

  • Actualidad Nacional

    MTS (México)

  • EDITORIAL

    LTS (Venezuela)

  • DOSSIER : Leur démocratie et la nôtre

    CCR NPA (Francia)

  • ContraCorriente Nro42 Suplemento Especial

    Clase contra Clase (Estado Español)

  • Movimento Operário

    MRT (Brasil)

  • LOR-CI (Bolivia) Bolivia Liga Obrera Revolucionaria - Cuarta Internacional Palabra Obrera Abril-Mayo Año 2014 

Ante la entrega de nuestros sindicatos al gobierno

1° de Mayo

Reagrupar y defender la independencia política de los trabajadores Abril-Mayo de 2014 Por derecha y por izquierda

La proimperialista Ley Minera del MAS en la picota

    LOR-CI (Bolivia)

  • PTR (Chile) chile Partido de Trabajadores Revolucionarios Clase contra Clase 

En las recientes elecciones presidenciales, Bachelet alcanzó el 47% de los votos, y Matthei el 25%: deberán pasar a segunda vuelta. La participación electoral fue de solo el 50%. La votación de Bachelet, representa apenas el 22% del total de votantes. 

¿Pero se podrá avanzar en las reformas (cosméticas) anunciadas en su programa? Y en caso de poder hacerlo, ¿serán tales como se esperan en “la calle”? Editorial El Gobierno, el Parlamento y la calle

    PTR (Chile)

  • RIO (Alemania) RIO (Alemania) Revolutionäre Internationalistische Organisation Klasse gegen Klasse 

Nieder mit der EU des Kapitals!

Die Europäische Union präsentiert sich als Vereinigung Europas. Doch diese imperialistische Allianz hilft dem deutschen Kapital, andere Teile Europas und der Welt zu unterwerfen. MarxistInnen kämpfen für die Vereinigten Sozialistischen Staaten von Europa! 

Widerstand im Spanischen Staat 

Am 15. Mai 2011 begannen Jugendliche im Spanischen Staat, öffentliche Plätze zu besetzen. Drei Jahre später, am 22. März 2014, demonstrierten Hunderttausende in Madrid. Was hat sich in diesen drei Jahren verändert? Editorial Nieder mit der EU des Kapitals!

    RIO (Alemania)

  • Liga de la Revolución Socialista (LRS - Costa Rica) Costa Rica LRS En Clave Revolucionaria Noviembre Año 2013 N° 25 

Los cuatro años de gobierno de Laura Chinchilla han estado marcados por la retórica “nacionalista” en relación a Nicaragua: en la primera parte de su mandato prácticamente todo su “plan de gobierno” se centró en la “defensa” de la llamada Isla Calero, para posteriormente, en la etapa final de su administración, centrar su discurso en la “defensa” del conjunto de la provincia de Guanacaste que reclama el gobierno de Daniel Ortega como propia. Solo los abundantes escándalos de corrupción, relacionados con la Autopista San José-Caldera, los casos de ministros que no pagaban impuestos, así como el robo a mansalva durante los trabajos de construcción de la Trocha Fronteriza 1856 le pusieron límite a la retórica del equipo de gobierno, que claramente apostó a rivalizar con el vecino país del norte para encubrir sus negocios al amparo del Estado. martes, 19 de noviembre de 2013 Chovinismo y militarismo en Costa Rica bajo el paraguas del conflicto fronterizo con Nicaragua

    Liga de la Revolución Socialista (LRS - Costa Rica)

  • Grupo de la FT-CI (Uruguay) Uruguay Grupo de la FT-CI Estrategia Revolucionaria 

El año que termina estuvo signado por la mayor conflictividad laboral en más de 15 años. Si bien finalmente la mayoría de los grupos en la negociación salarial parecen llegar a un acuerdo (aún falta cerrar metalúrgicos y otros menos importantes), los mismos son un buen final para el gobierno, ya que, gracias a sus maniobras (y las de la burocracia sindical) pudieron encausar la discusión dentro de los marcos del tope salarial estipulado por el Poder Ejecutivo, utilizando la movilización controlada en los marcos salariales como factor de presión ante las patronales más duras que pujaban por el “0%” de aumento. Entre la lucha de clases, la represión, y las discusiones de los de arriba Construyamos una alternativa revolucionaria para los trabajadores y la juventud

    Grupo de la FT-CI (Uruguay)