FT-CI

Breaking news

Israeli attack on Lebanon

14/07/2006

During the early morning of Thursday, July 13, Israeli planes
attacked Beirut airport, in Lebanon. This new attack is part of the
response promised by Prime Minister Ehud Olmert, to the actions of
Hezbollah (Lebanese Shiites), where 8 Israeli soldiers died and two
others were captured, as a demand for the release of prisoners in
Israeli prisons and in support of the Palestinian cause.

While the military incursion into the Gaza Strip remains firm,
Israeli air force planes bombed the road that links the capital of
Lebanon with Damascus, Syria. Only a few days before, the State of
Israel had threatened the Presidents of both Lebanon and Syria for
protecting the "terrorists" of Hamas (Syria, where the Hamas
leadership lives in exile) and of Hezbollah (Lebanon). At the same
time, Israeli warships launched missiles near Lebanon’s international
airport, which had been closed since morning. The television channel
of the Hezbollah militia was also hit. In this way, Israel again made
an incursion into Lebanon, having withdrawn in May, 2000. Katyusha
rockets were fired from Lebanon against the Israeli city of Haifa,
located 60 km south of the border between Israel and Lebanon.

More than 20 Palestinians died on Thursday, and the Palestinian
Chancellory was attacked, in an attempt to find one of the Hamas
leaders, Mohamed Deif.

Mahmud Abbas, Chairman of the Palestinian National Authority (PA),
spoke of the danger of "a regional war."

Meanwhile, the European Union (EU) voted to send economic aid to
Gaza, to alleviate the difficult situation of the inhabitants of the
region, a situation caused by the Zionist attack. Without
questioning the military incursion for a second, the EU sent 300,000
liters of fuel for use in hospital generators in Gaza, but a great
deal of this aid, like that from the Arab League, $50 million US,
was sent directly to Abbas, bypassing Prime Minister Ismail Haniyeh,
to continue the pressure on the Hamas majority.

On Thursday, the United States, not satisfied with its total support
for the actions of the Zionist state, vetoed the UN Security Council
draft resolution, that condemned Israeli attacks in Gaza, a
resolution supported by ten of the fifteen Security Council members.
US imperialism’s support for its gendarme in the region is not
surprising; however, the US ambassador to the UN, John Bolton,
emphasized US cynicism, when he declared that the resolution
was "unbalanced, it imposes demands on one part of the conflict in
the Middle East, but not on the other."

Keys

 The situation of oppression and misery the Palestinian masses are
living through is a permanent source of uprisings against the State
of Israel, as we have reported in innumerable articles on this site
[http://www.ft-ci.org]. In the present escalation, to this is added
the fact that Iran, supporting Syria, is using its "resources" or
connections in the region, Hamas (Palestine) and Hezbollah (Lebanon)
 In the context of its aspirations for regional hegemony and taking
advantage of the quagmire of US imperialism in Iraq and differences
with the big powers over its nuclear program — to increase tension
and improve its position in the region. This is taking place at a
time when the United States finds itself with several open "external
fronts" on the international level, on the one hand, trying to
maintain its weak anti-Iran coalition (with respect to nuclear
weaponry), and nuclear testing by North Korea (a country that China
and Russia refuse to condemn, for the moment) on the other hand, as
well as a difficult G-8 summit in Moscow, facing a resurgent Russia.

 In this framework, Israel is going for double or nothing, by
launching the most important military operation since the invasion of
Lebanon in 1982, with the aim of qualitatively weakening the
Lebanese Shiite militias of Hezbollah and teaching them a lesson.
Meanwhile, with the invasion of Gaza, Israel seeks to do the same
thing to Hamas, although it is not clear whether Israel will be able
to bear incursions on two fronts in a sustained form, to achieve its
aims. Somehow, the collaborationist Abbas (Chairman of the
Palestinian National Authority), Jordan, and above all, the
government of Egypt and the Saudi monarchy (fierce enemies of Iran),
who sought a negotiated solution to the Gaza conflict before
Hezbollah proved the vulnerability of the Zionist state, are allowing
Israel to make these moves.

 The regional situation is becoming extremely tense: apart from its
specific roots, the conflict in Palestine and Lebanon must be seen in
the framework of the complicated situation of the United States in
Iraq and the advance by Iran in this strategic region.

  • TAGS
Related articles

No hay comentarios a esta nota

Newspaper

  • PTS (Argentina)

  • Actualidad Nacional

    MTS (México)

  • EDITORIAL

    LTS (Venezuela)

  • DOSSIER : Leur démocratie et la nôtre

    CCR NPA (Francia)

  • ContraCorriente Nro42 Suplemento Especial

    Clase contra Clase (Estado Español)

  • Movimento Operário

    MRT (Brasil)

  • LOR-CI (Bolivia) Bolivia Liga Obrera Revolucionaria - Cuarta Internacional Palabra Obrera Abril-Mayo Año 2014 

Ante la entrega de nuestros sindicatos al gobierno

1° de Mayo

Reagrupar y defender la independencia política de los trabajadores Abril-Mayo de 2014 Por derecha y por izquierda

La proimperialista Ley Minera del MAS en la picota

    LOR-CI (Bolivia)

  • PTR (Chile) chile Partido de Trabajadores Revolucionarios Clase contra Clase 

En las recientes elecciones presidenciales, Bachelet alcanzó el 47% de los votos, y Matthei el 25%: deberán pasar a segunda vuelta. La participación electoral fue de solo el 50%. La votación de Bachelet, representa apenas el 22% del total de votantes. 

¿Pero se podrá avanzar en las reformas (cosméticas) anunciadas en su programa? Y en caso de poder hacerlo, ¿serán tales como se esperan en “la calle”? Editorial El Gobierno, el Parlamento y la calle

    PTR (Chile)

  • RIO (Alemania) RIO (Alemania) Revolutionäre Internationalistische Organisation Klasse gegen Klasse 

Nieder mit der EU des Kapitals!

Die Europäische Union präsentiert sich als Vereinigung Europas. Doch diese imperialistische Allianz hilft dem deutschen Kapital, andere Teile Europas und der Welt zu unterwerfen. MarxistInnen kämpfen für die Vereinigten Sozialistischen Staaten von Europa! 

Widerstand im Spanischen Staat 

Am 15. Mai 2011 begannen Jugendliche im Spanischen Staat, öffentliche Plätze zu besetzen. Drei Jahre später, am 22. März 2014, demonstrierten Hunderttausende in Madrid. Was hat sich in diesen drei Jahren verändert? Editorial Nieder mit der EU des Kapitals!

    RIO (Alemania)

  • Liga de la Revolución Socialista (LRS - Costa Rica) Costa Rica LRS En Clave Revolucionaria Noviembre Año 2013 N° 25 

Los cuatro años de gobierno de Laura Chinchilla han estado marcados por la retórica “nacionalista” en relación a Nicaragua: en la primera parte de su mandato prácticamente todo su “plan de gobierno” se centró en la “defensa” de la llamada Isla Calero, para posteriormente, en la etapa final de su administración, centrar su discurso en la “defensa” del conjunto de la provincia de Guanacaste que reclama el gobierno de Daniel Ortega como propia. Solo los abundantes escándalos de corrupción, relacionados con la Autopista San José-Caldera, los casos de ministros que no pagaban impuestos, así como el robo a mansalva durante los trabajos de construcción de la Trocha Fronteriza 1856 le pusieron límite a la retórica del equipo de gobierno, que claramente apostó a rivalizar con el vecino país del norte para encubrir sus negocios al amparo del Estado. martes, 19 de noviembre de 2013 Chovinismo y militarismo en Costa Rica bajo el paraguas del conflicto fronterizo con Nicaragua

    Liga de la Revolución Socialista (LRS - Costa Rica)

  • Grupo de la FT-CI (Uruguay) Uruguay Grupo de la FT-CI Estrategia Revolucionaria 

El año que termina estuvo signado por la mayor conflictividad laboral en más de 15 años. Si bien finalmente la mayoría de los grupos en la negociación salarial parecen llegar a un acuerdo (aún falta cerrar metalúrgicos y otros menos importantes), los mismos son un buen final para el gobierno, ya que, gracias a sus maniobras (y las de la burocracia sindical) pudieron encausar la discusión dentro de los marcos del tope salarial estipulado por el Poder Ejecutivo, utilizando la movilización controlada en los marcos salariales como factor de presión ante las patronales más duras que pujaban por el “0%” de aumento. Entre la lucha de clases, la represión, y las discusiones de los de arriba Construyamos una alternativa revolucionaria para los trabajadores y la juventud

    Grupo de la FT-CI (Uruguay)