FT-CI

Immigrants resist Obama’s massive deportations

04/05/2014

Immigrants resist Obama’s massive deportations

Immigrants resist Obama’s massive deportations

Demonstrations in 40 cities across the U.S. took place this past April 5th against the massive deportations of immigrants. These demonstrations take place within the context of isolated but ongoing struggles throughout the country. Hunger strikes and actions of civil disobedience against deportations have becoming increasingly frequent. Although still lacking in coordination and with a firm stance against the government and the Democratic party, the frustration felt by undocumented immigrants has the potential to breathe life into other sectors of the workers’ movement in the United States.

The importance of immigrants to the American working class

The composition of the working class in the U.S. has undergone an enormous change in recent decades due to the influx of immigrants. In 1970, only 5.2% of workers were immigrants. By 1990, this figure had risen to 8.8%, and in 2011, it reach 16.2%. This translates to 25 million people in the workforce, half of whom are Latinos.i ii Although it is difficult to determine with certainly, it is estimated that 12 million are undocumented workers, equal to 5% of the total workforce in the country.iii

Where are they concentrated

While a small percentate of highly specialized workers exists in sectors like computer programming, nursing, engineering and medicine, the large majority of immigrants are employed in low-paying jobs.iv Because of to their undocumented status, many of them maintain a low profile to avoid calling attention to their status. The cynicism and the collusion between the state and the capitalists is astounding. The boss asks the worker for a social security number and documents which certify his legal status such as a birth certificate or drivers license. The employer knows or at least suspects that these papers may be false. Later on, the state does the dirty work and immigration authorities carry out raids in the workplaces with the aim of terrorizing immigrant workers. The cost to the employer? None, as the worker is quickly replaced. The consequeces for the worker, of course, are disastrous. The raids reinforce the dominance of capital over the working class as the fear of being deported forces workers to give up their universal rights and accept exploitive and abusive conditions.
In certain sectors, the immigrant workforce is highly concentrated, such as construction, service, fast-food, and above all, agriculture. According to writer and activist Michael Yates “almost all the men and women who plant, cultivate, and pick our crops are immigrants.” The workday is exhaustingly long, child labor is a common practice, and even cases of slave labor have been documented. The life expectance of a farm worker today in California is 49 years, the same as it was in 1960. In general terms, workers born outside of the U.S. earn a salary equal to 75% of native born workers.v

The first explosion.

The trade unions have not had a consistent policy of inclusion toward immigrants. In 2003, the first significant immigrant march took place, organized by the union HERE, and supprted by the AFL-CIO federation and other unions. The most important demonstration of the movement’s strength, however, took place on May 1, 2006 when 1 million immigrants throughout the country took to the streets and put their demands on the political stage.

The empty promises of Obama and the trap presented by Congress

Since then, the Democrats have succeeded in co-opting the movement, including immigration reform as a slogan in its electoral campaigns, and particularly through countless nonprofit aid organizations, including workers centers and advocacy groups. Although Obama promised to deliver on immigration reform during both presidential campaigns, the only policy he has implemented thus far has been a deferrment of deportation for two years (Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals) for a select sector of young immigrants. The biggest accomplishment of Obama, on the other hand, has been the deportation of almost 2 million people – more than any other president in U.S. history. This policy is strongly supported by the prison industry, which pockets $5 million daily thanks to the detention of immigrants.vi
After the 2012 elections, the Democrats, taking note of the importance of the Latino vote, approved an immigration reform bill in the Senate which would grant legal status to the majority of immigrants currently in the U.S. without documentation. In order to achieve citizenship, however, one would have to undergo a legal process which could take up to 13 years, and many would be left behind. On the other side, the bill would mean an increased militarization of the border and other mechanisms of control. The bill was never approved in the House of Representatives, which has a Republican majority. The Republicans, for their part, have proposed a series of individual “piecemeal” laws for certain immigrant groups while excluding the possiblity of obtaining citizenship, and always tied to the strengthening of border controls.

Where are they taking me?

The deportations have had an appaling destructive power. An immigrant man or woman is removed from his home or workplace and taken to a detention center before being tossed across the border, without papers, without money, and away from his family, friends and the life he has built over the years. It is not surprising then that, in a defensive shift, the principal struggle of immigrants today is to halt the deportations, and that the fight for citizenship has been moved to the background.
But this change has also meant that pressure has shifted from Congress to the White House. The excuse of a divided Congress where a Republican majority blocks reform is no longer valid. Immigrants today demand directly of President Obama that he take matters into his own hands and end the policy of deportations through an executive order. The disappointment in the President is evident in the number of Latinos expressing support for Obama in the past year falling from 71% to 48%.vii

More or less progressive, but all bourgeois

The Republicans, with an anti-immigrant discourse and programme, seek to placate their nationalist and reactionary base. Nevertheless, they are conscious of the need for action by the government, however timid, in response to this enormous social problem. The Democrats, knew that posing as progressives for years had no consequence, with a bill that never passed the lower house. Of course, in the case of granting citizenship to millions of Latinos, their votes would guarantee Democratic victories for years to come. The problem is that the Democratic Party, just like the Republican Party, represents the interests of the capitalist class. And for capitalists, there is nothing preferable to a situation in which the working class is weak. Keeping millions of workers undocumented and forced to work under inhumane conditions for little pay has been the primary immigration policy in the U.S.

I am tired of this game

But the fuses are breaking. Immigrants are becoming disenchanted with the Democrats and gaining courage. The spread of direct actions, hunger strikes, and demonstrations shows the great potential for mobilization, although still with a defensive posture. However, the co-optation of the movement by aid organizations prevents the posibility of an escalation similar to that of 2006. The principal task today is to overcome the diplomatic path put forward by organizations allied with the Democratic Party, such as CHIRLA, CARECEN, Hermandad Mexicana, NDLON, etc. None of these groups seeks to truly mobilize the immigrant community. There is not even a call on their webpages to march on May 1. Although the movement has had its experience with the Democrats, it still must break definitively and create an organization independent of the bourgeois parties. A true moblization of the rank-and-file is necessary in the workplaces and in the streets to demonstrate the power of immigrant workers. The alliance that must be forged is with the rest of the working class to fight together for their common interests. On one side, it is neccessary that the immigrant working class recongize its ally in the native-born working class and abandon the tactic of pressuring Congress or the White House under the leadership of “progressive” Democrats. On the other side, the working class organized in the unions, left parties, and other working class organizations must fight hand-in-hand to win the democratic rights of immigrant workers. Any alliance with the bourgeois parties will ultimately lead to cooptation and defeat.

[1] http://stateofworkingamerica.org
[2] Foreign-Born Workers: Labor Force Characteristics – 2012, Bureau of Labor Statistics, US Department of Labor.
[3] Barack Obama, deporter-in-chief, The Economist, February 8th 2014.
[4] Yates, Michael. Why Unions Matter. New York: Monthly Review Press, 1998.
[5] Ibid 2
[6] Pai, S. “There Are 5 Million Dirty Reasons for Record Deportations, Alternet, March 21st.
[7] Serrano, A. “Obama faces immigration protests in 40 U.S. cities”, Al Jazeera, April 4th 2014.

Related articles

No hay comentarios a esta nota

Newspapers

  • EDITORIAL

    PTS (Argentina)

  • Actualidad Nacional

    MTS (México)

  • EDITORIAL

    LTS (Venezuela)

  • DOSSIER : Leur démocratie et la nôtre

    CCR NPA (Francia)

  • ContraCorriente Nro42 Suplemento Especial

    Clase contra Clase (Estado Español)

  • Movimento Operário

    MRT (Brasil)

  • LOR-CI (Bolivia) Bolivia Liga Obrera Revolucionaria - Cuarta Internacional Palabra Obrera Abril-Mayo Año 2014 

Ante la entrega de nuestros sindicatos al gobierno

1° de Mayo

Reagrupar y defender la independencia política de los trabajadores Abril-Mayo de 2014 Por derecha y por izquierda

La proimperialista Ley Minera del MAS en la picota

    LOR-CI (Bolivia)

  • PTR (Chile) chile Partido de Trabajadores Revolucionarios Clase contra Clase 

En las recientes elecciones presidenciales, Bachelet alcanzó el 47% de los votos, y Matthei el 25%: deberán pasar a segunda vuelta. La participación electoral fue de solo el 50%. La votación de Bachelet, representa apenas el 22% del total de votantes. 

¿Pero se podrá avanzar en las reformas (cosméticas) anunciadas en su programa? Y en caso de poder hacerlo, ¿serán tales como se esperan en “la calle”? Editorial El Gobierno, el Parlamento y la calle

    PTR (Chile)

  • RIO (Alemania) RIO (Alemania) Revolutionäre Internationalistische Organisation Klasse gegen Klasse 

Nieder mit der EU des Kapitals!

Die Europäische Union präsentiert sich als Vereinigung Europas. Doch diese imperialistische Allianz hilft dem deutschen Kapital, andere Teile Europas und der Welt zu unterwerfen. MarxistInnen kämpfen für die Vereinigten Sozialistischen Staaten von Europa! 

Widerstand im Spanischen Staat 

Am 15. Mai 2011 begannen Jugendliche im Spanischen Staat, öffentliche Plätze zu besetzen. Drei Jahre später, am 22. März 2014, demonstrierten Hunderttausende in Madrid. Was hat sich in diesen drei Jahren verändert? Editorial Nieder mit der EU des Kapitals!

    RIO (Alemania)

  • Liga de la Revolución Socialista (LRS - Costa Rica) Costa Rica LRS En Clave Revolucionaria Noviembre Año 2013 N° 25 

Los cuatro años de gobierno de Laura Chinchilla han estado marcados por la retórica “nacionalista” en relación a Nicaragua: en la primera parte de su mandato prácticamente todo su “plan de gobierno” se centró en la “defensa” de la llamada Isla Calero, para posteriormente, en la etapa final de su administración, centrar su discurso en la “defensa” del conjunto de la provincia de Guanacaste que reclama el gobierno de Daniel Ortega como propia. Solo los abundantes escándalos de corrupción, relacionados con la Autopista San José-Caldera, los casos de ministros que no pagaban impuestos, así como el robo a mansalva durante los trabajos de construcción de la Trocha Fronteriza 1856 le pusieron límite a la retórica del equipo de gobierno, que claramente apostó a rivalizar con el vecino país del norte para encubrir sus negocios al amparo del Estado. martes, 19 de noviembre de 2013 Chovinismo y militarismo en Costa Rica bajo el paraguas del conflicto fronterizo con Nicaragua

    Liga de la Revolución Socialista (LRS - Costa Rica)

  • Grupo de la FT-CI (Uruguay) Uruguay Grupo de la FT-CI Estrategia Revolucionaria 

El año que termina estuvo signado por la mayor conflictividad laboral en más de 15 años. Si bien finalmente la mayoría de los grupos en la negociación salarial parecen llegar a un acuerdo (aún falta cerrar metalúrgicos y otros menos importantes), los mismos son un buen final para el gobierno, ya que, gracias a sus maniobras (y las de la burocracia sindical) pudieron encausar la discusión dentro de los marcos del tope salarial estipulado por el Poder Ejecutivo, utilizando la movilización controlada en los marcos salariales como factor de presión ante las patronales más duras que pujaban por el “0%” de aumento. Entre la lucha de clases, la represión, y las discusiones de los de arriba Construyamos una alternativa revolucionaria para los trabajadores y la juventud

    Grupo de la FT-CI (Uruguay)